The Senate, Wednesday, received with shock, the letter written to it by President Goodluck Jonathan rejecting amendments to the 1999 Constitution, when it was read on the floor of Senate by Senate President, David Mark, with some Senators openly expressing surprise at the reasons that occasioned the President’s veto.
Speaking on the development, Chairman, Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution (4th Alteration Bill 2015), Senator Ike Ekweremadu, announced that his members would hold a two-day retreat from Wednesday to Thursday to review the development.
The Senate President resisted attempts by members to subject Jonathan’s letter to debate, insisting that they need individual copies of the letter before they can make meaningful contributions.
However, Senator Abubakar Yar’Adua (Katsina Central), raised a point of order and insisted that the issue be discussed because of the serious fundamental issues raised by Jonathan, which affected the integrity of the National Assembly.
Yar’Adua said: “I think it is important for us to discuss that letter and see whether there is need for us to consider the letter or not.
“I think the President has raised very serious fundamental issues, especially in terms of our conscience as lawmakers and his own position as the chief executive officer of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. That is why I am raising this point of order.”
Though Mark agreed with Yar’Adua that the letter should be extensively discussed, he insisted the debate could only be meaningful after members would have studied the letter at home.
Mark said: “Obviously, this letter is not like any other normal letter. We can’t discuss the letter unless you have a copy of it. So, the first reaction is for me to make copies available to everybody and you go and study it.
“If you notice that there is an announcement also by the Constitution Review Committee that they(members) are going to meet. So, that will straight away go to them. I agree with you that weighty issues have been raised. It’s a peculiar case; so everybody will be involved.”
Jonathan, had insisted in the letter that he would not assent to the amendments because they did not satisfy the strict requirements of Section 9(3) of the 1999 Constitution.
He also queried the decision of the National Assembly to reduce some Executive powers of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, faulting some amendments which will give Executive powers and duties to the Legislature and the Judiciary.
Jonathan made his position known in a seven-page letter to Senate President, David Mark and House of Representatives Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal.
He also listed 12 errors in the amendments.
They are Non-compliance with the threshold specified in Section 9(3) of the 1999 Constitution on amendments; alteration to constitution cannot be valid with mere voice votes unless supported by the votes of not less than four-fifths majority of all members of National Assembly and two-thirds of all the 36 State Houses of Assembly.
Others are, the Right to free basic education and primary and maternal care services imposed on private institutions; flagrant violation of the doctrine of separation of powers; unjustified whittling down of the Executive powers of the Federation vested in the President by virtue of Section 5(1) of the 1999 Constitution and the 30 days allowed for assent of the President.
Comments