The Senate yesterday took on former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, over his controversial comment that the National Assembly was using constituency projects to siphon public funds, accusing the former president of being out to undermine the sanctity of the parliament.
The Senate went on to claim that it was the administration of Obasanjo which approved the building of constituency projects into the national budget, challenging the former president to furnish Nigerians with details of how the National Assembly members became executors of the national budget, rather than being lawmakers.
Recall that Obasanjo had on Wednesday during a book launch in Abuja, accused federal lawmakers of corruption. He said: “Apart from shrouding the remunerations of the National Assembly in opaqueness and without transparency, they indulge in extorting money from departments, contractors and ministries in two ways. They do so during visits to their projects and programmes and in the process of budget approval when they build up budgets for ministries and departments who agree to give it back to them in contracts that they do not execute. They do similar things during their inquiries.”
Not yet done, the former president continued, “Corruption in the National Assembly also includes what they call constituency projects, which they give to their agents to execute but invariably full payment is made with little or no job done. In all this, if the executive is not absolutely above board, the offending members of the National Assembly resort to subtle or open threat, intimidation and blackmail. When the executive pays the huge money, normally in millions of dollars, all is quiet in form of whitewashed reports that fail to deal effectively with the issues investigated.”
The Senate, which responded to Obasanjo’s allegations through the Chairman of its Committee on Information, Media and Public Affairs, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, described the accusation of corruption against it by the former president as unfortunate and an attempt to tarnish the image of the National Assembly.
The Upper Chamber in the statement expressed disappointment with the former president for distorting the issue of constituency projects to mean a direct monetary advance to lawmakers and thus amounting to the “promotion of corruption” by the National Assembly.
Describing the allegation as spurious, Abaribe stated that Obasanjo’s comment was far from the truth and nowhere near reality, adding that if it were so, the former President would not have tolerated such for the period he was president of the country.
Hear the Senator, “President Obasanjo for the avoidance of doubt, was the initiator of the constituency project in the year 2000 as a means of ensuring that projects were fairly spread across the country using Senatorial zones as the spring board.
“To ensure execution of the projects, President Obasanjo again factored the constituency projects into the annual budgets to be implemented by the executive depending on availability of funds. That is to say that no lawmaker ever comes close to the funds or even determine the contractor for the said projects or when the said contract would be awarded.
“So, it looks curious and surprising that President Obasanjo would turn around after over ten years of initiating such a project to allege that the National Assembly is performing the function of both the executive and the parliament.
“Is it not preposterous for anybody to believe that members of the National Assembly would, against the provisions of the constitution with regards to application of separation of powers, award contracts ‘to their agents to execute’ and expect the Presidency under a President Obasanjo or any other President for that matter to pay for what they are not part of?
“Such allegation stands logic on its head, as it amounts to an indictment of the Presidency for willfully contravening the budget laws by ceding its power to execute to the National Assembly, if it was the case,” he said.
The Senate through Abaribe therefore, challenged the former President to go a step further to furnish Nigerians with details of how the National Assembly members became executors of national budget rather than being law makers.
“It will also help to clear the allegation once and for all, if any presidency official not only from the time past but currently, could come forward and explain the true position of the so-called constituency projects. Doing so would at least set the records straight,” he added.
The Senate Spokesman cautioned political leaders to be wary of the consequences of his utterances to the nation’s democracy.
Comentários