top of page
Writer's pictureAdmin

Assemblies of God crisis: Paul Emeka loses at Supreme Court

The leadership crisis rocking the Assemblies of God Church came to an end on Friday. This is as the Supreme Court in a unanimous judgement by five Justices, resolved all the issues in favour of the General Council of the Church.

‎With this judgement, Rev. Dr. Chidi Okoroafor has now been confirmed as the authentic General Superintendent of the Church.

DAILY POST recalls that the Church had for some years now been enmeshed in a serious leadership crisis, which culminated into dividing the Church into two groups.

‎Following the suspension of Rev. Paul Emeka by the General Council, he had approached an Enugu State High Court where he got a favourable judgement.

The respondents in the matter, including the General Superintendent, Rev. Okoroafor proceeded to the Appeal Court where the judgement of the lower court was upturned.

Emeka later headed to the Supreme Court insisting that his fundamental rights were trampled upon.

But in a judgement on Friday, the apex Court ruled that fundamental right enforcement could not fly over the Assemblies of God leadership.

In the lead judgment by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the apex court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal in Enugu, which had upheld the suspension and dismissal of Emeka by the church.

The decision of the Court hinged on two major issues for consideration.

It held that there was no proper proof that the suit at the trial court was properly served on the respondents as required by law.

The Supreme Court held that it was wrong for the appellant to have served his originating summons filed before the the Enugu State High Court, on No. 5, Mbalano Street Enugu, in Enugu State, when the order of the court was specific and categorical that the process should be served on Evangel House of the church in Enugu.

The Court held that the case of wrongful service was clear from the affidavit deposed to by a court bailiff in Enugu, stating that he served the originating summons on one Shadrack Lawrence through one Richard Ake when the Enugu High Court ordered that the summons must be taken to the Evangel House of the church.

According to Justice Kekere-Ekun, in the eyes of the law, the originating summons was not served on the proper party as required by law.

She therefore held that the respondent could not be held liable because the issue of service was a fundamental one in law.

She held that the purported service wrongly effected was null and void and no suit could be validly built on it.

On the appellant’s alleged violation of his fair hearing by the church, the apex court held that the fundamental human right as enshrined in the Chapter Four of the 1999 constitution did not cover a head of church sacked and expelled by the church.

The apex court added that the right to be a member of a church was not a right recognised under the Chapter Four of the 1999 Constitution.

“Being a pastor, General Superintendent and member of a church is not a fundamental right as envisaged in the 1999 Constitution.

“The remedy for the removal of the appellant as a pastor, General Superintendent and a member of the respondent, does not fall within section 36 because the right to be a pastor is not a constitutional one”, the court held.

Meanwhile, the Church has already started the process of taking over its headquarters in Enugu, which was hitherto being controlled by the Rev. Emeka led group.

0 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page